Online compiler/interpreter/IDE


I had been using whenever I wanted to run a piece of code and didn’t have the required compiler/interpreter in the system I was using. But the main disadvantage with this was that you cannot read input from the user while using this site – scanf(), cin, , etc. (in C, C++, Perl respectively) are promptly ignored. This was often an irritation since I’d have to modify my program to not take an input before testing there, which might not be an easy process (especially given complex data structures).

Today, I came across, which is very similar to the above, except that it allows providing input to the program! Yay! You type (or paste) the program in a text area as in codepad, choose your language from the list, and then click on “click here to paste input (stdin) or additional note”. Whatever you type here becomes the input to your program. That’s a neat solution to the problem of providing input to remotely-evaluated programs.
And it supports “more than 40 languages”, including Assembler, Common Lisp, and even Whitespace (of course the boring old C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, etc. are there too). It has other goodies like syntax highlighting for all these languages, ‘private’ pasting for times when you don’t want others to see the code, etc. The site is quite very well done.

While we’re in the topic, let me also add two more online code evaluation tools (compilers/interpreters):

* Lord of the REPLs: This is a Read-Eval-Print-Loop from Google, where each line you enter is evaluated immediately. Despite the fancy “Lord” name and the Google brand, I haven’t found this very useful mainly because: it doesn’t preserve function definitions or variables’ values after you evaluate them, unlike other REPLs. This makes it hard to run anything more than trivial “hello world” programs. Also, I found it quite buggy at times.

* “Compile & Execute”: This is somewhat similar to ideone, allowing you to enter your own input and having a choice of a similar number of languages. However, it doesn’t have a ‘private’ pasting option, and has syntax highlighting for only a few languages. This leads to weird highlighting at times: if you choose to paste Perl code, the Highlight choice remains in cpp (which is the default), so your Perl code gets highlighted as C++ code! Sloppy design like this makes me think this site might not be very well designed.

These two are the only generic code evaluation tools I could find. If you find that none of these do it for you, try googling for something specific to your language. For example, for Python, searching for ‘python online (IDE OR compiler OR interpreter)’ gives a lot of good results.

If you know some other online code evaluation tool, or have experience with any of the above, do share it in the comments. Thanks!


Project Euler Problem No.5


Consider the numbers you have to test:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Break up the composite numbers to prime factors:
1, 2, 3, 2*2, 5, 2*3, 7, 2*2*2, 3*3, 2*5,
11, 2*2*3, 13, 2*7, 3*5, 2*2*2*2, 17, 2*3*3, 19, 2*2*5

For a number to be divisible by each of these groups, they have to show up among the prime factorization of our number.

The smallest number divisible by 1, 2, and 3 is 1*2*3 = 6.
To find the smallest number divisible by 1, 2, 3 and 4, we don’t have to multiply all of them together because there’s some redundancies. (2,2,3) is the smallest set that includes the sets (2), (3) and (2,2). So 2*2*3 = 12 is the smallest number divisible by 2, 3 and 4.

There are no 5s in the set (2,2,3), so the first number divisible by 1 through 5 has to be (2,2,3,5) = 60.

6 is 2*3, and we already have that, so we’ve found the number divisible by 1 through 6. Since 7 is prime, our new number has to be (2,2,3,5,7) = 420 in order to be divisible by everything up through 7.

8 is 2*2*2, so in order for (2,2,2) to be a subset we need to add one more two to get (2,2,2,3,5,7).

Continue on like this to get (2,2,2,3,3,5,7) for 9, which is already set for 10=2*5. 11 is prime, so we have (2,2,2,3,3,5,7,11). We’re all set for 12, because 12=2*2*3 and we have two 2s and a 3. For 13 we need (2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13). This already includes the factors of 14=2*7 and 15=3*5. For 16 we need an extra 2, to get (2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13).

Then to 17: (2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13). 18 is all set. 19 makes it (2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 19). And 20 is all set because we already have (2,2,5).

So the shortest number is
2*2*2*2 * 3*3 * 5*7*11*13*19 = 1,3693,680